![]() ![]() Those reviews are very different from the gamers who speed play through the game (if you finished it in under an hour, you're doing something wrong) and then complain about things relating to the story or otherwise. I mock them because their reviews boil down to that they bought a game without even looking at what it was and then go and complain about it, when it is entirely their fault they bought the game without investigating it first.Īgain, I have no problem with the people who actually left long, thoughtful critiques on Metacritic (though those are far and few between), those people were expressing an opinion after fully experiencing the game and then thinking about it and explaining their results. I mock them because they are not thoughtful. If they have the right of free speech to make not-thoughtful opinions (and they certainly have that right, I wouldn't gainsay them that at all), then don't I have the right of free speech to criticize their opinions? REVOLT REVOLT THE OPPRESSORS ARE TAKING YOUR VOICE! You and others like you are the reason the world is decending into chaos. Done.īut you mock them for sharing their thoughtful opinions, fiendishly crushing the right of free speech. Is the game fun, that's all they care about. Some people play games for the pure entertainment value, they don't care about games as "art" so, naturally, they aren't going to be the most critical of reviewers. Where are the spooky things and where is my ghost shooter 9000?" But most of them boil down to "I expected to be shooting spooky things. ![]() If they ever manage to make Vitaminwater actually taste good, you let me know.Īnyways, if the majority of dissenting user reviews on Metacritic were actually indepth comments on why they disliked the game (and some of them are and are valid because of it), then it would be fine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |